In a groundbreaking analysis released by Gemini alongside Glassnode, recent findings indicate that almost 31% of the total Bitcoin supply is now managed by centralized entities.
This change reflects a staggering accumulation of over 6.1 million BTC, translating to around $668 billion at current market values. The trend underscores significant institutional interest and investment in Bitcoin over the past ten years, suggesting a shift in how this digital asset is perceived by major financial players.

The Rise of Centralized Treasuries
The data highlights a remarkable surge, with centralized Bitcoin holdings rising by 924% since 2014. This encompasses a variety of holders, including Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), public companies, and centralized custodians.
As we observe Bitcoin’s price journey from below $1,000 to greater than $100,000 during this timeframe, it’s evident that institutions are increasingly adopting Bitcoin as a fundamental asset.
While this evolution may signal a more developed market, it brings forth concerns regarding centralization and the potential sway these entities could have on Bitcoin’s overall ecosystem. Notably, approximately 50% of Bitcoin held under centralized entities finds refuge on exchanges, suggesting a reliance on custodial solutions rather than direct ownership.
It’s important to note that many of these coins are held for retail customers, illustrating how average users interact with centralized platforms. When analyzing the aggregate assets of ETFs, public funds, and government treasuries, the institutional dominance in the Bitcoin realm becomes undeniable.
Another critical insight from the report is the concentrated ownership within institutional segments. Dominant players within ETFs, DeFi, and publicly traded firms often control between 65% and 90% of their respective allocations, indicating a high level of market influence maintained by early adopters.
Government Entities and Market Dynamics
Notably, government entities are also emerging as major players in the Bitcoin market, acquiring substantial holdings through activities such as asset forfeiture. Nations including the United States, China, and Germany have amassed large BTC reserves, raising questions about the implications of sovereign ownership.
Despite being relatively inactive, these government wallets possess enough Bitcoin to create ripples in market sentiment if they decide to sell or transfer their assets.
The report ultimately suggests that the centralization of Bitcoin holdings signifies a pivotal transformation in its market architecture. As Bitcoin weaves itself deeper into the conventional financial landscape, its price volatility might stabilize, moving closer to that of traditional investment vehicles.
Nonetheless, researchers remind us that Bitcoin still carries risks and will continue to behave in ways typical of emerging asset classes, albeit with some characteristics aligning more closely with established financial instruments.
Image created with DALL-E; chart provided by TradingView.