Recent developments concerning a governance decision have sparked significant discontent among holders of WLFI. Many feel sidelined as a small faction rapidly advanced their agenda. The discussions online and on-chain are indicative of a growing rift.
Exclusion from Voting Rights
Recent reports indicate that approximately 80% of TLFI tokens are currently locked, leaving a vast majority of investors virtually voiceless regarding critical votes on treasury allocations.

This inability to vote has triggered backlash. Early investors express frustration over the management of community resources without comprehensive participation from all holders.
Social media and forum discussions are increasingly demanding transparency and a definitive strategy to unlock these tokens, emphasizing the necessity for inclusive governance.
Dominance of Senior Wallets in Voting
Analysis of voting data reveals that a limited number of wallets exerted considerable influence over the decision-making process. Reports have highlighted that nine wallets aggregated nearly 60% of the voting authority, with one wallet significantly swaying the outcome.
The governance vote confirming a portion of the treasury for USD1 incentives has attained a 77.75% approval rate.
This was achieved thanks to active community engagement that carefully assessed the proposal, steering the future direction of the WLFI ecosystem.
— WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) January 4, 2026
However, the official voting results, indicating approximately 77.75% backing among active participants, have failed to alleviate concerns regarding the locked-token dilemma that many cite as central to the controversy.
Allocation Goals for Fund Utilization
The recently ratified plan allows a portion of the unlocked treasury to fund the USD1 stablecoin initiative. The proposal specifies that this allocation will not surpass 5% of non-restricted treasury assets.
Proponents argue that financial incentives will foster increased usage of USD1, ultimately benefitting the entire platform.
Critics warn against proceeding with expenditures before addressing token accessibility and governance integrity. They have also referenced historical price volatility following previous treasury unlocks as cause for caution.
I have yet to see discussions about this disconcerting governance vote involving World Liberty Fi this month, which possibly marks the beginning of a gradual depletion of value from WLFI investors by the management:
This appears to resemble a manipulated vote where the… pic.twitter.com/CGsj7vVUUk
— DeFi^2 (@DefiSquared) January 20, 2026
Pressure Mounts on Project Leadership
This ongoing dispute has heightened scrutiny on the project leadership, with stakeholders demanding a clear timeline for token unlocking.
There is also increasing advocacy for an examination of voting processes to ensure that major decisions reflect broader consensus from all impacted holders.
Celebrity Ties to WLFI
Notably, individuals connected to former President Donald Trump have been associated with WLFI through both advising and investing roles.
This affiliation has intensified media interest and has led to speculation about potential biases in governance outcomes due to these prominent connections.
Such connections further complicate ongoing debates surrounding token accessibility and concentrated voting power.
Featured image courtesy of Gina Ferazzi/Los Angeles Times, chart from TradingView